Barla and Argarwala (2020), as cited in Assi et al. (2016), observed that piracy at sea happens because of instability on land. Onuoha (2012), in his study of the menace, proposed the need to turn to focus away from the water toward the ground, from whence the actual risks at sea indeed come. This requires the GoG states to use their oil wealth to combat youth unemployment, poverty, and hardship by breeding pirates and sea-armed robbers. Strategies to combat piracy in the region, such as greater law enforcement, the installation of monitoring and surveillance systems, the development of Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA) capabilities, and the purchase of necessary security platforms, are failing to match up with the threat (Vogel, 2011), which is evolving each day to outsmart these strategies meant to catch up with them.
Piracy is a symptom of a more significant problem (Onuoha, 2013), such as youth unemployment and corruption, which requires a new approach or intervention different from the current system that is not sustainable in the long term. The dominant approach to fighting piracy off the coast of Africa is narrow-minded, with deterrence, surveillance, and military interventions not being effective long-term solutions to the persistent problem (Bueger et al., 2011). Aboh and Ahmed (2018) are also of the view that these criminal activities are symptomatic of state failure and weak administration on land, not only a maritime security issue but also additional variables such as political exclusion, corruption, deprivation, politicisation, income inequality, and the politicisation of institutions and policies. Attacks by pirates in the Gulf of Guinea exacerbate the growing food security crisis among coastal residents (Asua et al., 2021), which can also lead to high unemployment among the coastal young and energetic youth, which may compel them to ply their trade at sea as pirates as an alternative means of putting food on the table. Yunusa (2021) asserts that the causes of maritime insecurity in the study area are porosity of the territorial waterways, globalisation, corruption, unemployment, socioeconomic exclusion, and politics. He further stated that the initial maritime insecurity in the GoG caused by illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing on a fishing boat has evolved into organised maritime crimes committed by pirates.
In addition to having the world’s youngest, largest and fastest-growing population, Africa has the most significant youth unemployment rate, with young people accounting for the most substantial part of the population. The youth population is one of Africa’s most important resources and, if used wisely, can be vital to the continent’s development.
The QUEER LADDER THEORY, as cited by (Assi et al., 2016), offers the most significant explanation for the problem of youth unemployment, which is pushing young people into sea piracy and ultimately contributing to maritime insecurity in the area. This theory was selected to best describe the threat of youth unemployment in the GoG region, particularly among the youth of the coastal settlements along the entire area, among other hypotheses.
Daniel Bell (1919–2011), as cited in Assi et al. (2016), an American sociologist, invented the term “queer ladder” to explain the functional relevance of organised crime as a desperate strategy for socioeconomic empowerment and social ascending. Since then, this analytical tool has developed a widely utilised theoretical framework in modern crime analysis and studies.
The QUEER LADDER THEORY has three assumptions: 1. Organized crime is an instrumental behaviour/practice and a means to an end. 2. It is an instrument of social climbing, fame, and socio-economic advancement. 3. It is a means to accumulate wealth and build power.
With the above assumptions, the theory accepts and opines that crime thrives well when the government fails to control crime and abnormal behaviour in society effectively and efficiently due to public corruption and lack of legitimate livelihood for the populace. In these conditions, there is a strong incentive to engage in criminal activity and to prevent people from doing so, which makes space for criminal impunity and power (Assi et al., 2016).
It is pertinent to state that the predominance of piracy, armed robbery at sea, and other types of criminal activity in the GoG applies this theory to explain the behaviour of the youth in the region. The “ladder” concept, in theory, denotes the need by the youth to make a living and find their place higher in the social status or ladder. The energetic and brave ones will resort to piracy as the last option and legitimate means to put food on the table while being seen by the larger society as an awkward, unconventional (queer) path to survival. The study adopts this theory due to its analytical utility in providing insights into the cause of unemployment, which can lead to sea piracy, armed robbery, and organized crime in the maritime domain of coastal developing countries.
Anyimadu (2013) opined that suppression of piracy in the region by national, regional, and international military interventions could not be a long-lasting solution; therefore, the need to identify the root cause of piracy in the region to enable policymakers to find a lasting and sustainable solution to this challenge. The unemployment rate among the youth in the region is reoccurring, contributing to the cause of armed robbery and sea piracy, which leads to maritime insecurity in the region.
Manny scholars have made recommendations to curb criminal activities in the region’s maritime domain. Yunusa (2021) believes that improving citizens’ living conditions and adopting modern technology for crime prevention in the area would help reduce the menace in the region. Improving living conditions may sound good, but it must be well designed and focused on eradicating unemployment among the region’s youth and not necessarily seeking political favour from some disgruntled groups within the population. Modern technologies for detecting and preventing crime may have suppressive implications and not necessarily dismantle the root cause of the problem.
Youth empowerment and job creation in the region are always recommended (Assi et al., 2016), but how relevant and lucrative is this solution to the youth engaged in piracy if such empowerment and job creation programmes fail to get the youth rehabilitated and reintegrated into society to become a functional part of it. Youth empowerment and job creation as a better option with a bottom-up approach to redress the grievances of the youth as the nucleus of the solution can go a long way to get the child back into the mainstream economy.
Governments in the region should meet their citizens’ developmental aspirations, especially the youth. A clear commitment to sustainable economic growth and development for the citizenry is required to expand opportunities for self-actualisation for the teeming population and serve as a disincentive against criminality at sea.
Ukeje and Mvomo Ela (2013), encourage civil society actors and all stakeholders to bring on a new bottom-up approach to the current agenda of national governments, regional institutions, and international actors and look beyond military and policing matters to open up an entirely new discourse to explore broader perspectives of solving the problem.
Bueger (2013) suggests increasing communication and information-sharing platforms to develop a common stock of knowledge, information, and training centres with convergent maritime security regime complexes to educate and empower new naval forces with the current requisite knowledge to address the challenge. At the same time, Barrios (2013), who is also of the same view, recommended a global approach to tackle the root causes of piracy linked to development cooperation projects, security sector reform, EU civilian and military assistance, training of national coastguard and navy officers, the use of the equipment and the development of information-sharing practices and input from civil society. In this respect, a solution is to empower security forces to fight crime with less focus on misplaced priorities and instead help the youth find an alternative livelihood beyond piracy.
The Yaoundé Code of Conduct and Regional Information Sharing, to promote regional maritime cooperation and a stable maritime environment, can contribute to regional prosperity (Ifesinachi & Nwangwu, 2015) if there is collective effort among the regional states not to capture created capital by some elites at the expense of the youth who need the most help.
Many more solutions and interventions have been recommended that fail to curb the threat of piracy and armed robbery in the region. Yunusa (2021) suggested adopting modern technology for crime prevention in the region, while Assi et al. (2016) called for youth empowerment and job creation. However, these suggestions do not eradicate the risk because of the various disorder and challenges militating against regional states. The lack of a universal definition and appropriate legislation can also be a barrier to successfully eradicating the threat in the region. However, there is a suggestion for a global approach to tackle the root causes by promoting development cooperation projects, security sector reform, EU civilian and military assistance, training of national coastguard and navy officers, the use of equipment, and the development of information-sharing practices and input from civil society (Barrios, 2013). Attempts with a collective effort by the global community to deal with the situation will not suffice without a better understanding of the root causes and addressing it from that standpoint, and not rather suppressing the symptoms emanating from the piracy activities in the region.
Oyewole (2016) and Ahmad (2020) are of the view that dealing with maritime piracy involves coordinated and orchestrated efforts at different levels, coordinated selective intervention, better collaborations, improved target hardening, viable legal regimes, commitment to enhance state capacity, promotion of human development, policy harmonisation and coordination. Hence, the need to move away from the more punitive interventions not yielding the needed results to a more responsive approach that seeks to meet the youth at the point of their socio-economic needs.
Denton and Harris (2022) advocate for institutionally strong and democratic regimes within the region. However, solid and democratic governments that fail to have a proper welfare system to integrate the youth into the mainstream economy cannot end piracy with solid democratic governance structures.
Focusing on ashore economic growth, infrastructural development, providing job opportunities for young people (Fattah, 2017) and leveraging oil affluence to address unemployment, poverty, and deprivation in riverine communities that nurture sea pirates (Ezeozue, 2021) was also recommended. At the centre of all these scenarios is the troubled youth who need critical attention and appropriate initiatives to get them out of abject poverty while surrounded by the elite making much from the oil finds.
Barla and Argarwala (2020) admitted that most of these recommendations and efforts to resolve the problem by the global community had been concentrated on the skewed thinking of piracy as an issue of the sea, which has resulted in the use of naval power, making it a short-term solution. They further asserted that the long-term solution to the problem is to focus on land, which is the breeding source of pirates. Furthermore, Hansen (2009) indicated that there are better approaches toward a long-term solution in the region than oppressive measures for combating piracy. The oppressive approach may sound laudable but fails to prevent prospective youth from returning to the sea to practice their trade at any opportunity.
Policymakers and implementers must begin to approach the problem of piracy and maritime insecurity from the perspective of putting our teeming, energetic young youth to good use. This is feasible through the Local Content Development Programme, an initiative in the oil and gas sector to promote indigenous participation in the oil and gas sector. This paper advocates that this approach is more holistic and appropriate as the youth can be encouraged to partake in oil and gas and not feel excluded in this economic activity. The search for a long-term solution or approach to fighting piracy in the region is possible with the underlying concept of using local content development programs to promote long-term strategic goals of both the oil-producing country and international oil organisations involved in the joint business of oil exploration, appraisal, development and production in the region.